Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '17 at 15:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 703
69% 565 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 60.4
52% 64.1 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 53.9
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,666
Write 1,516
Mixed 1,371
407% 1,851 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 61
226% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 169
180% 304 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 285%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
175GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 502
Mixed 517
115% 515 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 50.5
181% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 168
175% 288 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
854GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 122
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.2
105% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2500 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 21.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback