Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T3610
Motherboard	Dell Precision T3610 (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '17 at 13:23
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 632 62% 505 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 354.56 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Lighting 27.1 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 31.2 22% 27.6 fps	MRender 35.5 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 22.3 22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB 9,379 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13729 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1233 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 87 87 444 (B2) Unknown 94 94 214 (B3) Unknown 95 95 370 (B4) Unknown 95 95 7694 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (E8) Unknown 94 94 3818 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20138841443 (F2) Unknown 99 99 34206378237	74.2% Very good	Read 470 Write 267 Mixed 310 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 23.2 102% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 92.2 DQ Mixed 68.2 83% 151 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 327GB free Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 0 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1972 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 4350750459 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12653 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 230 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 60 538902560 (C2) HDA temperature 32 40 77309411360 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 39 37 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 104908871183947 (F1) Unknown 100 253 58143376 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3432833413	53.2% Above average	Read 93.9 Write 91.7 Mixed 91.5 70% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.68 118% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,344 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 118GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 88.7 Write 98.8 Mixed 29 88% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.17 61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 45%
BOXX MKNUFDVS8GB 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 7GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 140 Write 28.6 Mixed 36.6 66% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.87 117% 4.78 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GB 598 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 37.2 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 12.4 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	945x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	562x
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples	249x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	237x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	218x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	52x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	168x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	145x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16