Performance Results


Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ 2,253 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 82.8 1-Core 35 2-Core 69.4 43% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 67.9 8-Core 70.1 9% 69 Pts	64-Core 69.5 4% 69.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650 725 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 0840) 256MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV1 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 232 Write 44.2 Mixed 72.9 25% 116 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 1.33 28% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.7 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 3.7 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon X1650AMDBench 1%, 725 samples	1x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $125

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16