Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMar 13 '17 at 02:05
Run Duration741 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 65
2-Core 121
53% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 277
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
XFX(1682 2990) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 10
Parallax 12.2
11% 11.9 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 12
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
262GB free
Firmware: SD35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
51GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
10GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
135GB free, PID 0201
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 65.8
Write 63.5
Mixed 52.6
77% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 44%
Generic Flash Disk 126GB
56GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Read 1.51
Write 3.55
Mixed 0.86
3% 1.97 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.01
12% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 11%
WDC WD40 0UE-22HCT0 40GB
22GB free, PID 2506
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 24.3
Mixed 7.16
22% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.25
38% 0.48 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Performance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback