MSI X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7882
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882)  (all builds)
Memory60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160721
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMar 13 '17 at 00:06
Run Duration596 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 233
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 717
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 125
Parallax 106
96% 116 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 131
Splatting 113
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
221GB free
Firmware: DXT06L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 461
Write 240
Mixed 232
68% 311 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 14.4
96% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 32.8
85% 182 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 80%
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXT06L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 496
Write 238
Mixed 262
73% 332 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 14.9
98% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 33.7
90% 194 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75%
Great: 80%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 128GB-$110
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,726
Write 623
Mixed 889
236% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 41.7
175% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 408
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 133
149% 257 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 174%
Great: 188%
Generic Mass-Storage 537GB
500GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 4.99
Mixed 8.62
11% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.22
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.01
27% 2.41 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 29%
Generic Mass-Storage 537GB
498GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.28% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 7.84
Mixed 8.35
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.69
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.009
29% 2.57 MB/s
Generic Mass-Storage 537GB
490GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 6.93
Mixed 5.3
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.01
28% 2.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 41.4
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 111%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882) Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $470
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback