Asrock Z77 Performance

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Performance (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120301
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '17 at 20:28
Run Duration	364 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 450 59% 445 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7990 (CrossFire Disabled) 1,161 User benchmarks, average bench 34% AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Lighting 50.7 Reflection 34.1 Parallax 62.7 41% 49.1 fps	MRender 32.3 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 42.3 34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 14156770 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 6502580496312 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3619 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 78 (B1) Unknown 0 0 9 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14156770 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14156770 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14156770 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13616 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12041 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12041 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10381	36.6% Below average	Read 191 Write 86.5 Mixed 116 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 10.1 74% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 91.4 DQ Mixed 9 20% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34388181425 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5307 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4868 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2417 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5313 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5313 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 214749216800 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1476	98.9% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 173 Mixed 155 125% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.21 105% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34388181423 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5348 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4870 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2422 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5348 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5348 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 206159282210 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.1% Good	Read 113 Write 128 Mixed 74 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.19 92% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 107%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 150GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 31 320 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5180 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12023 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 16313 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6199 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 97 4 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 266 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 57 336396308 (C2) HDA temperature 71 53 487391261 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 267272 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 20 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 1 93659 (C8) Write error rate 99 73 439 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	36% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 64.2 Mixed 64 48% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.4 104% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 63%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 22GB free, PID b4b5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.88% Terrible	Read 19 Write 14 Mixed 12.2 18% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.75 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.75 76% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.88% Great: 18%
hp v150w 8GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 2d40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.01% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 8.89 Mixed 7.88 14% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.006 27% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.01% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 2,600 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.7% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 22.9 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 20.7 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Performance Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Performance

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	48x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	34x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	8x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16