HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8061
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '17 at 13:20
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 401
56% 411 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 467
Write 323
Mixed 330
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 21.6
98% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 12.9
39% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 95%
SMI USB disk 8GB
3GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 6.79
Mixed 9.92
14% 13 MB/s
4K Read 6.88
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.007
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G3 MT Builds (Compare 1,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $95
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback