Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds)
Memory	50.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160309
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '17 at 18:47
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 242 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 53.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 212 66% 124 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 845 75% 634 Pts	64-Core 2,503 155% 2,503 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 354.56 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.5% Poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 26.8 22% 29.2 fps	MRender 43 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 32.5 29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM87 512GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 270GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 451 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 29 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2532 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1300882314 (F2) Unknown 99 99 1079221993	106% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 458 Mixed 492 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 35.6 148% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 123 142% 246 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 118%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 188 Mixed 152 131% 175 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.28 91% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR8N-UH 4x16GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 27.3 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 15.4 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 128%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	143x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	88x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	137x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	121x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	80x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	39x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	31x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	27x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 95%, 876 samples	82x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	62x
M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 963 samples	46x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16