Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '17 at 07:32
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 89
2-Core 177
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 553
52% 429 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 32% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250
206GB free
Firmware: L201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 485
Write 275
Mixed 363
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 27
124% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 117
128% 214 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85%
Great: 95%
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 488
Write 283
Mixed 366
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 28.2
124% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 116
127% 214 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 95%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
931GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 130
Mixed 130
113% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.47
149% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 93%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
655GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 120
Write 103
Mixed 97.2
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.34
115% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 21.6
Mixed 10.9
24% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.24
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.007
24% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.1% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback