Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '17 at 21:10
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 95.6 1-Core 79.1 2-Core 152 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 509 48% 398 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7633 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 159 Parallax 147 108% 146 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 144 Splatting 114 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 66GB free Firmware: 5.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 -132113194010299 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 948 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 2360 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 30 128850985088 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 65 65 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15266 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12817 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12817 (F2) Unknown 0 0 19928	40.4% Average	Read 192 Write 105 Mixed 123 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 13.7 73% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 27.3 43% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 61%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1230 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 984 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 29 (AE) Unknown 100 100 686 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2599 (B7) Unknown 100 100 40 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 50 214749872166 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 5570699536 (F7) Unknown 100 100 174298486 (F8) Unknown 100 100 137137964	80.1% Excellent	Read 508 Write 359 Mixed 396 93% 421 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 27.5 106% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 58.8 62% 104 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 113%
OCZ SOLID3 120GB 1,720 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 60GB free Firmware: 2.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 476771420015 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -104462194563842 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4396 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 155 (B1) Unknown 0 0 11 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 476771420015 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 476771420015 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 476771420015 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 429496729700 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11443 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10213 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10213 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17085	42.7% Average	Read 189 Write 102 Mixed 115 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 14.2 82% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 34.6 46% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 61%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 116GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 97 (03) Spinup time 121 121 25790316858 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1224 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 39891 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1202 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2464 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2464 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 244813529121 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	44.8% Average	Read 77.1 Write 78.8 Mixed 65 55% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.37 86% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 89GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 177 3983 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4465 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14734 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3628 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1064 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3400 (C2) HDA temperature 111 91 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.1% Good	Read 138 Write 95.4 Mixed 83.6 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.37 104% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 74%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 17GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 137 3925 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1875 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27126 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1488 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 989 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 885 (C2) HDA temperature 108 90 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.3% Good	Read 110 Write 111 Mixed 83.1 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.42 99% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 6,948 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 19.1 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 15.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 55.2 72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	380x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16