Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.09%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.09% Terrible	Memory 12.1 1-Core 12.5 2-Core 19.2 9% 14.6 Pts	4-Core 24.1 8-Core 22.3 3% 23.2 Pts	64-Core 18.9 1% 18.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.09% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galaxy GX0240ML105-G 256GB 422 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10072 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2000 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1733 (A9) Unknown 100 100 2228227 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 182 182 279201448240 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 280 (C2) HDA temperature 60 60 257700003880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	44.8% Average	Read 458 Write 190 Mixed 228 64% 292 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 8.31 46% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 26.7 DQ Mixed 6.99 11% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GB 4,502 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1334 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.89% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 4 8% 2.83 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 2.3 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 384 10% 384 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 7.89% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16