Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N450 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Memory 13.1 1-Core 5.1 2-Core 5.1 6% 7.77 Pts	4-Core 10 8-Core 9.4 1% 9.7 Pts	64-Core 8.2 0% 8.2 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP600 32GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 444 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 434 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 188 (C2) HDA temperature 54 54 201865494574 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	18.5% Very poor	Read 182 Write 46.4 Mixed 58.7 21% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 5.68 26% 8.19 MB/s	DQ Read 15.5 DQ Write 17.6 DQ Mixed 9.9 9% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 62%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 135GB 343 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 0GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.74% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 20.6 Mixed 7.19 21% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.08 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.008 15% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.74% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4542453231554538414653412D38472D4620 1x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	6.83% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 1 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 376 11% 376 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.83% Great: 9%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16