Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '16 at 04:25
Run Duration	596 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 152 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 485 47% 388 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50% Average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 80.7 50% 70.1 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 61.4 Splatting 56.3 50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4899 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 622 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 330 (C2) HDA temperature 67 57 184684838945	40.8% Average	Read 443 Write 21.6 Mixed 35.2 35% 167 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 6.1 64% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 56.8 DQ Mixed 11.5 29% 64 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS5C3015ALA632 1.5TB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 214GB free Firmware: ML5OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 115 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34386608537 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5526 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 146 146 29 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 39039 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2351 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5543 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5543 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 193274511390 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2	32.3% Below average	Read 54.2 Write 58.3 Mixed 65.5 45% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.47 4K Mixed 0.18 40% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 66%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 200GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 8291 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7343 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20403 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1212 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 529 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 165 165 107205 (C2) HDA temperature 122 104 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	73.9% Very good	Read 143 Write 115 Mixed 123 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.16 72% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 83%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 1,276 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 12GB free, PID 005b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	2.66% Terrible	Read 14.1 Write 2 Mixed 3.06 6% 6.38 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2.66% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB 14,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.2% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 17.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 13.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $465

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16