HP HPE-530sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP HPE-530sc (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB6
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110318
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '16 at 21:20
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 182 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 459 48% 385 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420 9,903 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1B0A 9083) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.32 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 2.39 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0711 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 27 Write 23.9 Mixed 26 19% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 4.69 4K Mixed 0.51 168% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 104%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 605GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 94 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 100 90 (03) Spinup time 130 100 25787171135 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9410 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24997 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 9403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 76876053 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 62 421593120 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9411 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9411 (C2) HDA temperature 187 157 163209871392 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.7% Good	Read 105 Write 128 Mixed 115 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.44 89% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 11,003 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP HPE-530sc

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)