Lenovo 68852EG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 68852EG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 68852EG
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '16 at 20:50
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 55
37% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 175
19% 152 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5018) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.41 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.57
3% 2.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC72203 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 481
Write 305
Mixed 369
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 13.9
51% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 35.4
DQ Mixed 10
13% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback