Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160913
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '16 at 22:43
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 91.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 235 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 755 74% 608 Pts	64-Core 946 59% 946 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36D1) Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 20.8 19% 20.6 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 17.5 18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	199% Outstanding	Read 1,822 Write 907 Mixed 1,137 284% 1,289 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 31 183% 70.8 MB/s	DQ Read 435 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 30.3 118% 265 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 716GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 141 141 34386280853 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 135 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8785 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 127 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 422 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 422 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 240519413795 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.8% Good	Read 115 Write 103 Mixed 110 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.19 81% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 513GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 172 164 6375 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 393 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 32904 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 383 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 294 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 129 129 213189 (C2) HDA temperature 119 94 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42% Average	Read 76.9 Write 69.2 Mixed 70.4 54% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.16 73% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 67%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 238GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 39.8 Mixed 39.4 51% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.2 67% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 49%
Samsung G3 Station 2TB 493 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 138GB free, PID 6014 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 38.2 Write 43.1 Mixed 41.1 54% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 2.75 4K Mixed 0.28 104% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 22%
Ext Hard Disk 1TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 93GB free, PID 0376 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 35 Write 39.5 Mixed 35.7 48% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.18 84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 68GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 51.9 Write 52.8 Mixed 51.7 68% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.19 57% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 44%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 57GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 36.5 Mixed 34.8 46% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.21 42% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB 1,424 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.3% Good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 20.4 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 18.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	170x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	64x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)