| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Emachines ET1810 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | eMachines EMCP73VT-PM |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090429 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 27 '16 at 22:41 |
| Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.6%
Average
|
40% 57.9 Pts
|
9% 65.4 Pts
|
4% 67.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Asus(1043 0356) 1GB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.673.0.0
|
6.49%
Terrible
|
6% 7.58 fps
|
7% 7.9 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
13%
Very poor
|
10% 3.53 GB/s
|
12% 4.07 GB/s
|
42% 95.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ET1810 Builds (Compare 3 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Emachines ET1810
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E7300Intel $28Bench 39%, 7,475 samples | 1x |
| Pentium D 2.66GHzIntel $129Bench 26%, 394 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $28 |