Toshiba SATELLITE S50-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE S50-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 12 '16 at 15:29
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 156
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 242
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 M260
Toshiba(1179 F923) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.137.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.77
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 10.8
6% 9.74 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 6.57
5% 6.14 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 481
Write 330
Mixed 344
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 20.6
114% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 93.9
62% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 126%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
347GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 99.4
Write 102
Mixed 98.9
130% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.21
67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
20GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 238
Write 94.3
Mixed 132
174% 155 MB/s
4K Read 9.24
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 4.08
510% 7.74 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 9.55
DQ Mixed 4.17
506% 8.09 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE S50-B Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE S50-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback