Asus 1015B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus 1015B (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1015B
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110209
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '16 at 09:03
Run Duration	667 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-50 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 26.7 1-Core 11.2 2-Core 20.9 14% 19.6 Pts	4-Core 19.5 8-Core 16.7 2% 18.1 Pts	64-Core 20.2 1% 20.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250 1,583 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84A4) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.792.0.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.81 0% 0.78 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.53 Splatting 1 1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1405 (03) Spinup time 154 127 1275 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18966 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 199 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3994 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4263 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 40985 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 631 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 124 124 229185 (C2) HDA temperature 101 88 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	34.5% Below average	Read 66.2 Write 54.2 Mixed 6.78 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.08 32% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 47%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Read 17 Write 3.07 Mixed 4.99 8% 8.37 MB/s	4K Read 1.37 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 5% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 4GB 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 3.37 Mixed 5.65 8% 8.26 MB/s	4K Read 1.29 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.005 6% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GB 1,374 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.59% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 1.6 MC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.8 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 275 14% 275 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.59% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16