Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160913
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '16 at 19:46
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 142 2-Core 288 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 927 92% 750 Pts	64-Core 1,129 70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1435) Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 47.8 Reflection 55.1 Parallax 44.8 39% 49.2 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 47.7 Splatting 62 49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 477GB free Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,489 Write 1,138 Mixed 1,260 288% 1,296 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 59.4 230% 86 MB/s	DQ Read 593 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 179 203% 354 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 343GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1592 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1214 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 382 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14712151288
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 227GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 188 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 182 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 52 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 87 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1221172377	106% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 414 Mixed 420 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 99.5 4K Mixed 45.8 181% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 52 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 121 93% 122 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
Toshiba THNSNH128GCST 128GB 1,729 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 114GB free Firmware: HTGAN102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5148 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3874 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3400 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 17187878257 (AE) Unknown 188 188 8847664385674 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1304 (C2) HDA temperature 70 50 214749544478 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 98879 (F2) Unknown 100 100 210436 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	102% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 472 Mixed 493 106% 472 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 36.1 139% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 195 170% 255 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 170 5875 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1358 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1660 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1230 (10) Unknown 1 199 22719018532 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 538 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 819 (C2) HDA temperature 120 110 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	75.3% Very good	Read 140 Write 122 Mixed 116 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.22 4K Mixed 0.36 133% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 168 5975 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1323 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1665 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1230 (10) Unknown 1 199 29999626036 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 548 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 774 (C2) HDA temperature 118 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 31 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	74.8% Very good	Read 136 Write 124 Mixed 124 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.77 4K Mixed 0.22 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 8x8GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	MC Read 50.7 MC Write 64.1 MC Mixed 51.4 158% 55.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 24.9 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 56.3 71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 147%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	301x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	181x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	175x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	64x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,765

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16