HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '16 at 19:23
Run Duration	7527 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 74.1 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 170 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 397 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 176B) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.6909 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.6909 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.29% Terrible	Lighting 7.97 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 20.8 6% 14.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 4.29% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 750GB 895 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 787 Write 729 Mixed 764 170% 760 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 30.7 103% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 112 116% 189 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 351%
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 256GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 205GB free, PID 1a15 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 206 Write 136 Mixed 87.8 166% 143 MB/s	4K Read 3.59 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.004 14% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 680 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.8% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	197x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	493x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16