| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150804 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '16 at 16:02 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.4%
Good
|
59% 96.1 Pts
|
32% 249 Pts
|
18% 287 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 390X-$340
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1025.0
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53%
Above average
|
52% 68.3 fps
|
56% 67.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
57.7%
Above average
|
64% 290 MB/s
|
90% 29.4 MB/s
|
19% 32 MB/s
|
|
|
76.1%
Very good
|
100% 132 MB/s
|
82% 0.89 MB/s
| |
|
|
77%
Very good
|
106% 139 MB/s
|
75% 0.82 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Vulcan-2133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.6%
Average
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
55% 73.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 299 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $782 |