Asus F1A75-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M LE (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '16 at 17:50
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80 2,796 User benchmarks, average bench 36% FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 42 2-Core 83.6 40% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 80.9 8-Core 82.5 11% 81.7 Pts	64-Core 82.2 5% 82.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	2.25% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 4.35 3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.25% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 180GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 55GB free Firmware: 1.35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 56040733279187 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 849 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 29 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1600 (EA) Unknown 0 0 704 (F1) Unknown 0 0 704 (F2) Unknown 0 0 64	24.6% Poor	Read 114 Write 67.2 Mixed 96.5 20% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 8.06 48% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 7.08 17% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 48%
OCZ VERTEX2 50GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 100 5751613 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8607114462343 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 784 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 32 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 102 100 5751613 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2816 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1664 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1664 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3136	21.2% Poor	Read 134 Write 31.5 Mixed 47.9 15% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 6.57 44% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 32.3 DQ Mixed 6.95 11% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 51%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB 2,489 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free, PID db8a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	8.5% Terrible	Read 30.6 Write 5.99 Mixed 6.93 14% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.98 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.21 41% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.5% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLN-8GK 2x4GB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.5% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 12.7 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.6 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M LE Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M LE

CPU
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	9x
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	9x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	4x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	3x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GBNanyaBench 49%, 402 samples	4x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16