Asus M51BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus M51BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51BC
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '16 at 17:29
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 133 60% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 407 41% 332 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 0493) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 22% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 51 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 27 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 225 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 131	65.2% Good	Read 502 Write 328 Mixed 336 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 9.87 69% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 97.7 DQ Mixed 43.1 53% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494235432 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 126 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 206 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 117 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 126 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 126 (C2) HDA temperature 139 139 236224512043 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	104% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 172 Mixed 169 133% 177 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.2 105% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 250GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 165GB free, PID 3000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 33.7 Mixed 12.3 32% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.28 50% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer 127GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 60GB free, PID 5530, Sandisk 128gb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 12.6 Mixed 16.4 24% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.64 80% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 992030 (997030) M378B5173DB0-CK0 F6451U67G1600G 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	97x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	16x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	12x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16