Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '16 at 13:44
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 223
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 428
57% 428 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6519
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.3% Good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 86.4
Parallax 83.4
72% 86 fps
MRender 82
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 69
61% 75.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 418
Write 74.7
Mixed 117
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 10.3
85% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 9.1
16% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
67GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 159
Write 151
Mixed 105
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 5.46
4K Mixed 0.66
200% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 24.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 21.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback