ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock E350M1

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock E350M1 (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '16 at 18:57
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350D APU 269 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	27.1% Poor	Memory 49.1 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 26.5 24% 31.7 Pts	4-Core 32.4 8-Core 34.9 4% 33.7 Pts	64-Core 33.1 2% 33.1 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6950 770 User benchmarks, average bench 20% AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 17.2 Reflection 21.1 Parallax 23.6 14% 20.6 fps	MRender 20.1 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 27 19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11137 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2061 (AA) Unknown 100 100 8819 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 231 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B5) Unknown 100 100 2018634629452 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 321 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	32.9% Below average	Read 270 Write 135 Mixed 175 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 2.15 46% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 39.2 DQ Mixed 3.77 10% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1x4GB 1,892 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 4760 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical E350M1 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock E350M1

CPU
E-350D APUAMDBench 27%, 269 samples	3x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	3x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6310 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 53 samples	1x

SSD
S600 120GBHPBench 54%, 1,850 samples	1x
1 28GBWalramBench 54%, 2 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
9905403-037.A00G 2x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 20 samples	1x
DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 8GBAdataBench 38%, 23 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback