Asus B150M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B150M-A  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 18:50
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 591
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 149
Parallax 140
100% 137 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 121
Splatting 110
91% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 354 403 347 207 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 366
Write 422
Mixed 302
SusWrite 307
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 34.4
123% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 249
201% 283 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 147 148 152 147 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 148
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 136 133 136 136 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 75 78 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 51
Write 77.7
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 74.4
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 66%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
223GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 108 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 30
SusWrite 109
64% 89 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
331GB free
Firmware: SM14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 80.5
Write 84
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 85
49% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.6
312% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 65%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 91 83 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 64.5
Write 91
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 87
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
166% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
599GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 89 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 135
Write 137
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 90.1
127% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 23.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M-A Builds (Compare 1,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B150M-A - $285

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback