Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 11:21
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 151
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 450
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 70.2%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
EVGA(3842 6253)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2111 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 39.9
34% 38.4 fps
MRender 45.5
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 38.9
34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 34.1%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 170 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 372
Write 322
Mixed 333
SusWrite 169
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 45.3
147% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 244
183% 245 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 82.2%
 Great: 129%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$67
902GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 168 168 168 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 158
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 167
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
376% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 97.8%
 Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
863GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 193 200 200 199 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 81.2
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 198
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1960, 1960 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 52.5%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

CPU
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples181x
FX-4300AMD  $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples72x
FX-8320AMD  $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples60x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples49x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples25x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples24x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples18x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples11x
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples10x
RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples36x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples35x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback