Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 29 2-Core 42.1 36% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 58.3 8-Core 58.3 8% 58.3 Pts	64-Core 59.6 4% 59.6 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT 12,718 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 82D4) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.41 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 169 155 174 226 236 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.5% Good	Read 253 Write 239 Mixed 197 SusWrite 191 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 31 113% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 134 105% 148 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x
3x1GBUnknownBench 17%, 7,767 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16