Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B45
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 88.3 1-Core 133 2-Core 265 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 885 87% 712 Pts	64-Core 1,111 69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 191 Parallax 190 146% 187 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 176 Splatting 0.13 72% 99.5 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50 5,775 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 190 185 185 184 186 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 459 Write 215 Mixed 200 SusWrite 189 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 25.3 100% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 253 195% 262 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 106%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: SBK2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 124 123 128 126 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 79 Write 126 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 120 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 197% 2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 67%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 13GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.74% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 1.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.2 5% 4.65 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2.74% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 4x8GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.2% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 24.3 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 24.6 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	154x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $82Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	141x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	137x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	194x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	122x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $973

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16