HP Mini

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Mini (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 361A
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090821
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	May 03 '16 at 09:40
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Memory 40.5 1-Core 6.8 2-Core 10.8 16% 19.4 Pts	4-Core 10.4 8-Core 9.8 1% 10.1 Pts	64-Core 9.6 1% 9.6 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK6028GAL 60GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: BN101C Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1967 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4022 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 18476 (0A) Spinup retry count 180 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3933 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 44 (BE) vendor-specific 58 49 723320874 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 401 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7274607 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 14 14 861306 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044511786 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 184 (DE) Loaded hours 78 78 9118 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 265 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	11.5% Very poor	Read 19.2 Write 20.6 Mixed 19.1 15% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 16%
Single Flash Reader 8GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 6335 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	5.06% Terrible	Read 16 Write 9.82 Mixed 11.5 15% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.22 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 10% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.06% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.38% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Mini

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)