Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 155 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 209 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D3) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 1.88 2% 2.29 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 444 Write 361 Mixed 348 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 31.7 105% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 359 272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 972020A (977020A) 1x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.5% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	1x

GPU
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16