Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 16:32
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 938
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 73
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 97.7
60% 77.7 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 79.1
57% 67.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 392 392 398 394 393 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 359
Write 403
Mixed 263
SusWrite 395
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 36.8
152% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 316
240% 322 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 106%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
301GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 401 401 404 403 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 392
Write 398
Mixed 377
SusWrite 392
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 27.3
88% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 66.2
DQ Write 52.3
DQ Mixed 61.6
46% 60 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
98GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 87
Write 87.2
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 75.8
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
646GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 72 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 73.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 73.4
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
265GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.8
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 101
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 28.9
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 30.8
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback