| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star WS63 8SL |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16K7 (all builds) |
| Memory | 28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180531 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 12 '18 at 11:20 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
|
38.3%
Below average
|
44% 73 Pts
|
18% 134 Pts
|
12% 193 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P4200
MSI(1462 1226) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9148
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.8%
Average
|
40% 63.7 fps
|
63% 77.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52%
Above average
|
57% 19.9 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
28% 144 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16K7 Builds (Compare 44 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16K7
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 20x |
| Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples | 13x |
| Quadro P4200NvidiaBench 71%, 536 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |