| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180529 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 11 '18 at 14:03 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
86.9%
Excellent
|
75% 126 Pts
|
72% 600 Pts
|
71% 1,150 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
116%
Outstanding
|
124% 179 fps
|
113% 139 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 317 318 318 316 311 MB/s
|
201%
Outstanding
|
239% 1,082 MB/s
|
211% 83 MB/s
|
579% 803 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
177GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 202 194 197 194 192 MB/s
|
97.5%
Outstanding
|
85% 381 MB/s
|
158% 55.3 MB/s
|
212% 312 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
741GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 469 470 467 467 467 MB/s
|
118%
Outstanding
|
102% 454 MB/s
|
175% 64.2 MB/s
|
229% 328 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz
|
119%
Outstanding
|
127% 44.4 GB/s
|
81% 28.5 GB/s
|
68% 59 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,745 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 277x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 206x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 191x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 193x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 155x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 115x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $860 |