Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 00:52
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73.8% Very good
SC Int 60.9
SC Float 83
SC Mixed 82.2
60% 75.4 Pts
QC Int 384
QC Float 362
QC Mixed 371
84% 373 Pts
MC Int 756
MC Float 806
MC Mixed 813
118% 791 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$467
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 398
50% 153 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 390
Splatting 246
127% 290 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 140%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$249
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 453 385 295 443 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 386
Mixed 356
SusWrite 411
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 43.3
152% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 344
262% 354 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 106%
Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$44
382GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 145 159 188 182 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 136
Write 93.2
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 169
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$40
137GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 97 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 63.2
Write 57
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 97.5
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 35.4
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 121%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $172SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $196SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback