MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '18 at 21:26
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 127 2-Core 228 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 675 68% 552 Pts	64-Core 678 42% 678 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 141 Parallax 119 104% 129 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 125 Splatting 104 89% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 250 248 260 257 230 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 415 Write 233 Mixed 252 SusWrite 248 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 20.9 114% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 233 193% 280 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 358GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 83 98 98 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 135 Write 157 Mixed 65 SusWrite 85.6 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 170% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x8GB 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	69.8% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.2 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 22.1 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	364x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	178x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	154x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	240x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	237x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	149x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16