Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite Pro R50-C  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Satellite Pro R50-C
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateApr 17 '16 at 21:34
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
Socket BGA1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 148
54% 117 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 207
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 18% Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 000D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4112
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.69
4% 6.52 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 11.5
7% 8.02 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 487
Write 124
Mixed 194
58% 269 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 10.9
76% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 11
28% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 15.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 681
6% 681 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro R50-C Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback