Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 118 51% 83.8 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 200 26% 199 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 1,651 User benchmarks, average bench 14% AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.11001.15002 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 22.1 15% 23.8 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 15.4 Splatting 31.7 21% 24.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 480GB-$300 1,286 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: R201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 120 123 144 131 122 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 187 Write 186 Mixed 179 SusWrite 129 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 16.5 56% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 19.7 DQ Mixed 20.3 16% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CT51264BD160B.C16F 3x4GB 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.2% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.5 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 938 samples	42x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	31x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	21x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $488

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16