Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '18 at 07:08
Run Duration	397 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2300 19,722 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 159 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 297 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.94 1% 1.14 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 214 213 211 214 211 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 465 Write 456 Mixed 387 SusWrite 212 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 40.5 132% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 366 276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 124%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 52 54 54 54 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 152 Write 150 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 53.7 70% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 270GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 89 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 86.6 Write 82.7 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 88.2 56% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 609GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 167 171 172 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 144 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 170 89% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 619GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 52 54 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 156 Write 145 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 53.6 71% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 107%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 610GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 83 84 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 118 Write 134 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 83.4 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 612GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 88 89 90 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 129 Write 143 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 89 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 605GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 89 89 90 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 107 Write 114 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 89.4 69% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 406GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 75 75 76 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 57.4 Write 104 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 75.4 55% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 185GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 156 154 154 156 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 136 Write 155 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 156 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 25GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 127 129 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 129 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 74%
USB3.0 2TB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 5GB free Firmware: 0101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 140 Write 144 Mixed 79 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 104%
USB3.0 2TB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 148GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 133 138 135 136 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 136 Write 148 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 136 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 104%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 138 137 133 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 201 Mixed 122 SusWrite 135 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 307% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 105%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 667GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 132 129 130 132 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 151 Write 152 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 130 171% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.3 210% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 86%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 124 124 123 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 119 Write 115 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 122 147% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 60%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 664GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 132 132 137 136 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 140 Write 150 Mixed 110 SusWrite 134 182% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT25664BA160B.C16F 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT25664BA160B.C16F 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 16 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	189x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16