Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 07:56
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 797
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB; ZT-P10710C-10P Zotac Gtx-1070 ti amp edition
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 145
Parallax 122
108% 133 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 130
Splatting 112
95% 116 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 324 320 316 314 316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,507
Write 1,466
Mixed 1026
SusWrite 372
296% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 86.3
295% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 934
700% 931 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 256%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
224GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 485 397 290 256 305 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 484
Mixed 454
SusWrite 369
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 62.7
204% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 123%
Great: 128%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
105GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 94 95 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 501
Write 471
Mixed 376
SusWrite 119
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 38.8
141% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 179
182% 293 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 91%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
106GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 92 92 93 93 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 504
Write 459
Mixed 369
SusWrite 118
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 38.5
141% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 181
183% 292 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 175 175 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 137
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 174
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 44.7
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 37.5
108% 37.9 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 131%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $800
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback