| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W570power (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3517-A1 |
| Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210621 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 04 '22 at 10:00 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
75.2%
Very good
|
81% 146 Pts
|
60% 491 Pts
|
38% 619 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8840) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
|
79%
Very good
|
82% 100 fps
|
73% 90.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 376 391 385 385 388 MB/s
|
91.5%
Outstanding
|
87% 387 MB/s
|
132% 52.8 MB/s
|
125% 214 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.4%
Very good
|
74% 25.9 GB/s
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W570power Builds (Compare 30 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W570power
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 13x |
| Xeon E3-1275 v5IntelBench 78%, 368 samples | 8x |
| Xeon E3-1275 v6IntelBench 81%, 198 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples | 6x |
| Quadro P600NvidiaBench 16%, 3,885 samples | 6x |
| Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $167 |