HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop 79%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '21 at 15:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 521
57% 450 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8621) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 346 348 345 347 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 396
Write 344
Mixed 316
SusWrite 337
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 26.2
88% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 182
138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B88G0NF-DI Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 830B NT2GC64B88G0NF-DI 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback