Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 170
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 291
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 37
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 35.1
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 266 77 89 83 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 374
Mixed 337
SusWrite 154
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 48.5
164% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 246
203% 291 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 103 106 104 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 119
Write 104
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 104
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
38GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 110 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 117
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 108
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB-$30
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback