PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte AX370-Gaming |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180315 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 31 '18 at 05:51 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 178 181 177 194 174 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 127 128 133 127 131 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
General UDisk 67GB
45GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.1 MB/s
|
1.87%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 72x |
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 39x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 37x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 31x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $528 |