Asus P5KPL/1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5KPL/1600  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 00:48
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 23
2-Core 42.6
29% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 44.5
8-Core 44.7
6% 44.6 Pts
64-Core 45
3% 45 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 0.78
2% 1.88 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.87
2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 59 61 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 209
Write 118
Mixed 198
SusWrite 58.8
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 22.6
76% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 22.7
19% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 95%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
115GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 59 61 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 72
Write 72.1
Mixed 40
SusWrite 59
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
289GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 159 170 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 184
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 164
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
778GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 24.4
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 23.1
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB
12GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 3.7 3.2 4.4 3.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4
9% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.4
119% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL/1600 Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $185
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback