Asrock H310M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '18 at 16:26
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 704 73% 589 Pts	64-Core 714 44% 714 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	58.3% Above average	Lighting 72.1 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 67.8 59% 70.2 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 67 Splatting 71.7 58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
256GB 253GB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0618A SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 421 442 449 373 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 435 Mixed 339 SusWrite 361 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 45.2 152% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 208 178% 260 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 780GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 153 186 185 186 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 172 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 178 106% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C17 2x4GB 729 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 24.4 84% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 27.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV - $60

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	317x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	316x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	194x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	118x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	39x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	46x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	35x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16