| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A75M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130503 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 29 '18 at 19:20 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.1%
Above average
|
55% 88.7 Pts
|
25% 190 Pts
|
13% 203 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
|
4.19%
Terrible
|
4% 5.34 fps
|
4% 4.91 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 346 345 368 353 357 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
73% 325 MB/s
|
123% 39.6 MB/s
|
88% 176 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
705GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 98 105 98 104 MB/s
|
50.5%
Above average
|
65% 88.1 MB/s
|
198% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
644GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
36% 26.5 MB/s
|
108% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
21% 7.2 GB/s
|
48% 82.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A75M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 3x |
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 2x |
| A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8370DAMDBench 2%, 5,124 samples | 2x |
| GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 1x |
| HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $36 |