PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision T1600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T1600 (all builds) |
Memory | 14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130924 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 29 '18 at 05:27 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 266.87
|
2.97%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 76 102 113 119 123 MB/s
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
3GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 3.7 4.4 4.1 4.4 MB/s
|
4.14%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 11 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 193x |
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples | 160x |
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples | 96x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 51x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 46x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |