Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus WS X299 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '18 at 11:54
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$420
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 75.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 1,002
89% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,790
111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 30
27% 28.7 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 32.9
25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 213 218 213 214 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 826
Write 452
Mixed 368
SusWrite 218
103% 466 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 30.4
147% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 359
324% 494 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 115%
Great: 144%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 181 181 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 179
Mixed 103
SusWrite 183
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
387% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB
693GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 36.1
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 36.7
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-020.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.2% Good
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 18
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 11
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback